Keep the core. Connect the next capability.

AI & automation
integration for
legacy systems.

Bring AI and automation into the systems your organization already depends on. GS Consulting builds approved interfaces, reliable data flows, and controlled workflows around existing applications, starting with an integration architecture assessment.

20-minute fit check · One workflow is enough to begin

Build around what worksIntegration pattern

New capabilities

Private AI
analysis
Workflow
automation
Analytics &
reporting

Integration & control

APIsMiddlewareEventsRPA
Map data · Validate · Review · Log
Approved reads and writes
Retained foundationYour system of record

ERP · CRM · custom applications · databases

Interfaces and write permissions are agreed for each workflow.

Keep the core systemModernize one workflow at a time
Choose the right connectionArchitecture shaped by your constraints
See a documented implementationSpecialized AI connected to an operational platform

API vs middleware vs events vs RPA

Choose the connection
your system can support.

The right integration starts with the system's supported interfaces and the work you need to perform. We compare the options against reliability, security, transaction behavior, and the cost of keeping them running.

01

APIs

Defined application operations

Best when
A supported interface exposes the records or actions the workflow needs.
Design for
Authentication, versioned contracts, rate limits, transaction behavior, and confirmation of completed writes.
02

Middleware

Translation and coordination

Best when
Several systems need shared mappings, routing, or a bridge between different protocols and data models.
Design for
Clear ownership, transformation tests, monitoring, and capacity so the integration layer stays maintainable.
03

Events

Work that reacts to change

Best when
A supported event or change feed can trigger work without making every system wait for an immediate response.
Design for
Duplicate handling, ordering, schema evolution, replay, and visibility into delayed or failed processing.
04

RPA

Controlled screen interaction

Best when
A stable, permitted user-interface workflow is the practical connection point.
Design for
Dedicated identities, UI change detection, exception review, and a maintenance plan as the application evolves.

These methods can work together. Middleware can coordinate API calls, events can trigger background work, and RPA can support a remaining screen-based step. The assessment documents the tradeoffs for your environment.

Database extraction and normalization

Give automation data
it can actually use.

Start with approved exports, read replicas, bounded queries, or supported change data capture. Choose the extraction path around source load, data freshness, licensing, and operational ownership.

  1. Extract within an agreed boundary. Define datasets, access, schedules, and checkpoints.
  2. Normalize the meaning. Map keys, types, units, timestamps, relationships, and business rules.
  3. Validate and reconcile. Check completeness, duplicates, source totals, and rejected records before downstream use.

AI can help interpret ambiguous content. Extraction rules, validation, and delivery still need explicit software behavior and independent checks.

From source fields to a data contractIllustrative mapping
Examples of legacy fields and the rules needed to normalize them
Legacy fieldNormalized contract
CUST_NOCustomer identifierPreserve leading zeros and source references.
AMTAmount + currencyDefine precision, units, and the currency source.
LAST_UPDTimestamp + time zoneConfirm source time semantics before conversion.
STATUSDocumented business stateMap codes explicitly; route unknown values for review.

Version the mapping. Keep rejected records visible. Reconcile the result with the source.

Incremental modernization

One useful workflow.
A foundation you can extend.

Retain the core system where it still does its job. Add a bounded capability, prove its operating behavior, and use the result to guide the next investment.

  1. 01 / Establish a baseline

    Start with approved reads.

    Map one workflow, choose a source and destination, and measure current effort and data quality. A read-only pilot can test analysis or reporting with limited authority.

  2. 02 / Connect the workflow

    Prove the handoffs.

    Validate outputs, exercise exceptions, and confirm receipt in the destination. Where writes are needed, agree permissions, review gates, and reconciliation first.

  3. 03 / Expand deliberately

    Modernize in increments.

    Add sources or capabilities after acceptance. Plan cutover, recovery, monitoring, and ownership for each change; retire components only when replacement is justified.

Implementation evidence

Specialized automation.
Connected to operations.

GS Consulting's cyber-analysis case study shows a private AI pipeline producing structured JSON that a custom integration places into an approved SIEM or database for indexing and search.

  • Custom Python handles approved inputs, model interaction, and structured output.
  • The integration makes analysis available inside an existing operational platform.
  • Workflow orchestration exposes execution state and failures; people retain consequential decisions.
Published cyber-analysis architecture connecting approved host data, private AI, structured JSON, workflow orchestration, and a SIEM or database
Architecture from the published implementation. Click to view at full size. Client data and client interfaces are not shown.

Evidence of connecting specialized automation to an operational system. Your application's interfaces, controls, and acceptance criteria are assessed separately.

Security boundaries and audit logging

Make every boundary
and handoff explicit.

Define what data can move, what each identity can do, who approves consequential actions, and what evidence operators need to understand the result. Use the safe legacy write back guide when a workflow will change authoritative records.

Scoped access
Separate read and write permissions, use approved service identities and secrets handling, and document the allowed operations for each connection.
Data and AI boundaries
Agree permitted fields, destinations, model deployment, retention, and review requirements. Validate outputs before they enter a downstream workflow.
A usable audit trail
Record correlation IDs, source references, processing versions, approvals, failures, and destination acknowledgments. Keep credentials and unnecessary sensitive content out of logs.
Recovery and reconciliation
Design retry limits, duplicate handling, exception routing, and reconciliation for partial failures. Confirm external effects before retrying a write.

Integration architecture assessment

Turn a systems problem
into a buildable scope.

Bring one workflow, the system it depends on, and the result you need. We assess the constraints and define a practical path to a working integration.

Agree the assessment's scope, price, dependencies, and milestones before work begins. A separately scoped pilot can then test the recommended architecture against acceptance criteria.

Scope My Integration Start with a 20-minute fit check

You leave the assessment with

  • A system and workflow mapOwners, interfaces, dependencies, and deployment constraints.
  • An architecture recommendationAPI, middleware, event, and RPA options with explicit tradeoffs.
  • A data and control specificationExtraction, normalization, validation, permissions, and audit logging.
  • A bounded pilot planDeliverables, acceptance criteria, dependencies, estimate, and operating owner.

Before an engagement

Practical questions.
Clear starting points.

Architecture, compatibility, data access, and what it takes to begin.

Can we add AI and automation without replacing our core system?

Often, yes. An integration layer can connect new capabilities to an existing system of record while its core transactions continue to run there. We assess interfaces, data access, supportability, and operating constraints first. If a system cannot support a safe connection, the assessment identifies the remediation or replacement decisions needed before that workflow can proceed.

How do you choose between APIs, middleware, events, and RPA?

Use supported APIs for defined application operations, middleware for translation and coordination across systems, events for asynchronous reactions to changes, and RPA for suitable screen-based steps when supported interfaces are unavailable. These methods can be combined. The choice depends on vendor support, transaction behavior, latency, change frequency, permissions, and who will maintain the connection.

How do you extract and normalize data from a legacy database?

We assess approved exports, read replicas, bounded read queries, or supported change data capture against production load and freshness requirements. Field mappings define identifiers, types, timestamps, units, and business meaning. Validation and reconciliation check completeness, duplicates, and source totals; invalid records follow an exception path. AI can assist with interpreting ambiguous content, with its output evaluated separately from deterministic extraction and validation.

What does an integration architecture assessment deliver?

For an agreed workflow, the assessment documents systems, owners, interfaces, data flows, and constraints. You receive an architecture recommendation, an interface tradeoff analysis, extraction and normalization requirements, security boundaries, an audit logging plan, and a bounded pilot scope with acceptance criteria, dependencies, and a delivery estimate. Scope and price are agreed before assessment work begins.

Can AI or automation update records in the legacy system?

Write access is a separate design decision. An approved write path needs scoped permissions, input validation, transaction rules, review requirements, and confirmation from the destination. Model output alone does not authorize a change. We define how duplicate requests, partial failures, reconciliation, and recovery are handled before enabling production writes; a read-only pilot can establish value first.

Can you integrate with our specific ERP, CRM, or custom application?

We assess the specific product, version, supported interfaces, licensing, and deployment restrictions before confirming compatibility. The published cyber-analysis case study demonstrates custom integration of structured AI results into an approved SIEM or database. That provides evidence of the integration approach; your application and workflow require their own architecture and acceptance checks.

How do we start, and what determines cost and timing?

Start with a 20-minute fit check and a high-level description of the workflow, source system, desired destination, and outcome. Complexity depends on interface access, data quality, volumes, security requirements, write behavior, and vendor dependencies. We agree scope, price, and milestones before delivery. Share initial requirements at a public level; detailed system information can move through an approved channel later.

Your next working connection

What should your existing
system be able to do next?

Tell us where data gets stuck or work becomes manual. We will help scope an integration architecture assessment around that workflow.

Scope My Integration Review the assessment deliverablesStart with a high-level description. Share detailed system information through an approved channel later.